By: Leong Sze Hian

Yet another record for Changi AirportĀ 

I refer to the article ā€œChangi Airport handled a record 58.7m passengers last year, 5.9% higher than in 2015ā€ which said,Ā ā€œChangi Airport handled a record 58.7 million passengers last year, 5.9 per cent higher than in 2015.ā€

I used to work at the airport in the 1970s and whenever Iā€™m at the airport ā€“ I try to talk to the low wage workers like the airport trolley handlers, baggage handlers, etc.

Progressive wage model plans for aviation industry

In this connection, according to the article ā€œProgressive wage model plans for aviation industryā€ (Straits Times, May 8, 2014),Ā ā€œsalaries of 240 airport trolley handlers were already increased from about $580 to as much as $1,000″ inĀ August 2013.

We seemed to be soĀ proud of this achievement of having increased the pay of these workers from $580 to ā€“ and I think hereā€™s the catch ā€“ ā€œto as much as $1,000ā€³.

So, does it mean that some were still being paid somewhere between $581 to $999? And what about the other about 5,760 outsourced contract workers who were not mentioned along with the 240 trolley workers working under airport operator Changi Airport Group? (see here)

See also  Indonesian workers listed for sale on Carousell; MOM investigates

Moreover, the ā€œfrom $580 to as much as $1,000ā€ ā€“ was also subject to ā€“ ā€œdepending on their work attendance and performanceā€ (ā€œPay doubled for airport trolley staffā€œ, Straits Times, Aug 16, 2013).

Proud of this achievement or SHAME?

The article added that this rise of about 40 per cent of their wages is part of Ā National Trades Union CongressĀ (NTUC)ā€™s efforts to improve the pay of low-wage out-sourced contract workers (Note ā€“ only 240 workers out of about 6000 out-sourced workers).

We should be ashamed of the fact that after our much touted trade union movement and tripartiteā€™s efforts all these years ā€“ our world class award-winning airport was paying such ā€œslave wagesā€ ($580) to as I understand it mostly elderly Singaporeans (ā€œThese workers, who are mostly in their 50s to 70sā€).

Declining real pay for years?

And if and even when we achieve $1,000 pay for all the airport trolley workers, it may still be in real terms after adjusting for inflation, come to around a 40% decline in pay, compared to about 15 years ago.

See also  Proportion of PMET retrenchment hits all-time high while number of foreigners on S-Pass increases

It was also said that a progressive wage model will be developed by the end of next year (2015) for six types of jobs (ā€œCurrently (August 2013), about a fifth of 6,000 outsourced contract workers under airport operator Changi Airport Group are on the NTUCā€™s wage scheme (ā€œprogressive wage modelā€).

The fundamental flaw of the much touted progressive wage model to address the issue of low wages, may be that most of the workers in the job categories, like cleaners and trolley workersĀ may never be able to progress up the career ladder, improve productivity, etc.

So much has been said about improving the wages for the low income workersĀ over the years by the government. But has there been real progress for them or is it all just arguably, overhyped statements and hot air to fudge the issues caused by our arguably, flawed economic and social policies?

Canā€™t find ā€œairport trolley handlerā€?

In this connection, according to the Ministry of Manpowerā€™s (MOM) wages benchmarking tool ā€“ when I searched ā€œairport trolley handlerā€ ā€“ the result was ā€œThis occupation is not available for benchmarking, as we will only release data with sufficient coverageā€.

See also  Our response to the police report filed by Elections Department for alleged election advertising breaches during Bukit Batok By-Election

Basic median salary $1,000?

When I searched ā€œaircraft loader (e.g. airport baggage/cargo handler)ā€, ā€œbaggage handlerā€ and ā€œcargo handlerā€ ā€“ the results were ā€“ monthly basic median salary $1,000.

Still only $1,000?

So, does it mean that it may still only be about $1,000 now in 2016 ā€“ almost the same as it was loudly proclaimed in 2013? So much perhaps, arguably, for real ā€œprogressā€ in our ā€œprogressive wage modelā€!